Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawn (scripting language)
- Pawn (scripting language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Unable to find any news source coverage, only covered on gaming forums and the creators website. ― Padenton|✉ 21:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 21:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 21:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 21:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 21:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The article at least tries to make a case for notability. Not sure if it holds up to scrutiny, have to look further into it. —Ruud 11:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, no requested 3rd party references at all since October, 2013. SPA creation, editor not seen since 2011. –Be..anyone (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Strong Keep This language is used in the real world: http://www.compuphase.com/pawn/pawnprojects.htm
- Also, it was covered in Dr. Dobbs, under it's previous name: http://www.drdobbs.com/the-small-scripting-language/184411074 Caroliano (talk) 01:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I quickly found those two links. I will post more references latter, as they don't seem sufficient. But searching "small" on google will probably be quite difficult. Caroliano (talk) 06:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - not seeing significant, in-depth coverage from independent and reliable sources. Neutralitytalk 16:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)