Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EM simulation software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A Certain Lack of Grandeur (talk | contribs) at 05:06, 30 January 2015 (EM simulation software). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
EM simulation software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page contains no encyclopedic content and is uninformative, with no clear potential for improvement. A complete rewrite may be possible if sufficient information and sources could be obtained. MopSeeker (talk) 04:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Software comparison pages are relatively common on wikipedia (Category:Software comparisons has over 150 articles). When all of the software compared have individual pages/ are independently notable, as is the case here, such comparisons can be useful and encyclopedic.Dialectric (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. In my opinion, this does contain encyclopedic content and is helpful to readers who are interested in this type of topic. BenLinus1214talk 22:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 02:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the page is to be kept, then it may be best to move it to a name that indicates its nature as a comparison, and add more software to the comparison. The original page title may then be used for an article describing the type of software. MopSeeker (talk) 05:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]