Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SamuelDay1 (talk | contribs) at 09:39, 17 January 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journal, no independent references. Article has been speedily deleted four times previously--recommend salting if consensus is to delete. --Finngall talk 17:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Prior deletions were for issues of copyright and promotion, not for notability. The present article does not present those problems. As an open-access journal published by one of the major publishers (Elsevier) and indexed by the major academic journal indexers, I'd be willing to let this article stay. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 20:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 20:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep

"Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal" satisfies the Criteria mentioned in the "Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals)". For example, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal is indexed in SCOPUS. Please see http://www.scopus.com/results/results.url?sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=2001-0370&sid=3B399A6130211F68742EE4D9188827D7.zQKnzAySRvJOZYcdfIziQ%3a30&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=15&s=ISSN%282001-0370%29&origin=searchbasic&txGid=3B399A6130211F68742EE4D9188827D7.zQKnzAySRvJOZYcdfIziQ%3a3 Publications.assistant (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the automated redistribution of tables of contents by third parties for financial gain is not in depth coverage in independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Per WP:NJOURNAL:
      • Criteria
        1. The journal is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area.
      • Notes
        1. The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major indexing services in its field. Examples of such services are Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Scopus. A few simple mentions in passing that "Journal of Foo is an important journal" should not be taken as evidence that Criterion 1 is satisfied.
      Since this journal is indexed in Scopus, that appears to meet the stated criterion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Seriously meets the criteria of academic journals. SamuelDay1 (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]