Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal, no independent references. Article has been speedily deleted four times previously--recommend salting if consensus is to delete. --Finngall talk 17:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Prior deletions were for issues of copyright and promotion, not for notability. The present article does not present those problems. As an open-access journal published by one of the major publishers (Elsevier) and indexed by the major academic journal indexers, I'd be willing to let this article stay. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 20:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 20:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep
"Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal" satisfies the Criteria mentioned in the "Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals)". For example, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal is indexed in SCOPUS. Please see http://www.scopus.com/results/results.url?sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=2001-0370&sid=3B399A6130211F68742EE4D9188827D7.zQKnzAySRvJOZYcdfIziQ%3a30&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=15&s=ISSN%282001-0370%29&origin=searchbasic&txGid=3B399A6130211F68742EE4D9188827D7.zQKnzAySRvJOZYcdfIziQ%3a3 Publications.assistant (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete the automated redistribution of tables of contents by third parties for financial gain is not in depth coverage in independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Per WP:NJOURNAL:
- Criteria
- The journal is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area.
- Notes
- The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major indexing services in its field. Examples of such services are Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Scopus. A few simple mentions in passing that "Journal of Foo is an important journal" should not be taken as evidence that Criterion 1 is satisfied.
- Since this journal is indexed in Scopus, that appears to meet the stated criterion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Criteria
- Comment Per WP:NJOURNAL: