Jump to content

Talk:Integrated Deepwater System Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yobot (talk | contribs) at 11:08, 15 December 2014 (Tagging using AWB (10524)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / North America / United States Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Untitled

This article is highly promotional of its subject and U.S.-centric. For example,

This new "system of systems" will significantly contribute to the Coast Guard's maritime domain awareness, as well as the improved ability to intercept, engage, and deter those activities that pose a direct challenge to U.S. sovereignty and security. Deepwater will provide the means to extend our layered maritime defenses from our ports and coastal areas hundreds of miles to sea.

"Our ports and coastal areas"? Come now. In addition, the sentence "The Coast Guard selected the contractor who offered the best value from among the premiere system integration experts in the world" uses language fit for making a sales pitch (best value, premiere experts in the world), not an encyclopedia. It seems to me that this article needs to be cleaned up to describe the program in a much more objective manner. --Occamslawnmower 06:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NATIONAL SECURITY CUTTER not MARITIME SECURITY


Michael De Kort

What's the story here?--Conrad Kilroy 03:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

60 Minutes - "Troubled with Deepwater May 17, 2007)--Conrad Kilroy 22:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Anthony D'Armiento

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/121607Y.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.255.84.57 (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

The following sentences don't make much sense, and I don't understand them well enough to try to fix them:

"Because of the scale of the building program exceeded anything done by the USCG before, Deepwater is unique in that the primary contractors were tasked with are making design and procurement decisions on behalf of the Federal government."

"Recently news stories have surfaced demonstrating his warning that significant C4ISR problems will continue of all future ship assets, like the National Security Cutters, appears to be true."

Bobbozzo (talk) 08:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The NSC will have a length of 418 feet (125.2 m), be powered by a gas turbine engine with two auxiliary diesel engines, and be capable of 12,000 nautical mile (22,000 km) voyages lasting up to 60 days.'

I believe that this sentence is incorrect. The diesel engines are the prime movers and the gas turbine provides auxiliary power when necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.73.12 (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]