Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supernova (programming language) (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Supernova (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article on this student project was AfD'd a year ago for being sourced only to blogs and forums, with COI concerns: the author of that article requested speedy deletion before the AfD was closed. This version of the article seems no better. McGeddon (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The article is about free open source software developed by volunteers interested in AI, it's useful for natural programming languages researchers. Rorman68 (talk) 00:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC) — Rorman68 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- — Note to closing admin: Rorman68 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. McGeddon (talk) 08:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It's a programming language on Sourceforge with nine reviews. Being useful isn't the same as being notable and Google's first couple of pages gave me nothing that would pass wp:N Neonchameleon (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Innovative and notable programming language, I came across this language when I was checking PWCT once joined The ReactOS Project, PWCT is the most popular educational software on sourceforge and Supernova is integrated with that product. [1][2]
References
- Progmatwo (talk) 13:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)— Progmatwo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered are blogs and user-generated sites like Sourceforge, which we do not accept as reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial control. The closest to a usable source was the TechWell article, but realistically, this is a pretty marginal source and it only offers a fairly trivial mention. Googling turned up nothing. This topic wasn't notable last year, nothing has changed, and it's still not notable. Msnicki (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2014 (UTC)