Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity

Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was AfDed incorrectly and without explanation by a new user. Taking a look, it's pretty clear that this is WP:OR. The second sentence of the lead is "'Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity' is probably not an official term." Certainly fails WP:GNG and could probably be deleted per WP:NEO, WP:NOT, WP:MADEUP, or a host of others. I see it was PRODded with no explanation a while back, and thus declined, so that may preclude CSD. Given that, and the aforementioned attempted AfD, this seemed like the more appropriate venue. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, one of those cases where if WP:MADEUP was a speedy tag, it would be long gone. The only mention I can find of this subject online is in some obscure textbook-looking-thing, and no hits on scholar. Dea db eef 21:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadbeef: there is a (poosible) speedy tag: WP:A11. Stickee (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considered, but the article has to explicitly state that the author or someone they knew created the content according to the tag. Dea db eef 00:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Delete this article per the above nomination and the above opinion from Deadbeef. --DoctorBob3 (talk) 21:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage of this term anywhere. Possible WP:A11. Stickee (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]