Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neural Workflow

Neural Workflow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recommend speedy deletion. Topic fails notability, Google books returns only four entries. The only external reference is a half-baked blog entry. The article is probably comprised only of original research. The text of the article is basically nonsense. Chandler321 (talk) 15:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is original research.Frmorrison (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per nom, no RS coverage of this original research concept.Dialectric (talk) 11:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Insufficient WP:RS to establish notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]