Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Films set in 2015

Films set in 2015

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains only three films, and as there don't seem to be similar articles for other years, I'm going to say that Category:Films set in 2015 will suffice and this page fails WP:LISTCRUFT. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 01:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If there were more films, I'd say keep it but only 3 doesn't really need an article. If there are more in the future, it can always be recreated. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Films set in 2015 has six. I don't know if that's necessarily enough or too few for a standalone list here, but I'm also unfamiliar with this list/category scheme. Is it intended to target films set in a different year than the year of release and/or production? postdlf (talk) 15:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Postdlf: I'm not familiar with the system either, but six films still isn't very many. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if that is the intent, a list would be able to annotate that (and other details about the films) and make the intended list subject more clear. The categories have stuff like Godzilla (2014 film) in Category:Films set in 2014, so I'm not sure if that's due to poor maintenance or not, and I really don't see the point of listing or categorizing every film set in its year of release. postdlf (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Postdlf: What? G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]