Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoodooScript
- VoodooScript (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism with no signs of more or less widespread use, let alone compliance with WP:GNG. Proposed deletion declined by the author of the article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 15:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 15:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 15:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Looks to me to be in violation of WP:NOT#DICT. Johnny338 (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Delete: Per nom. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. See WP:NOT#DICT. -- Jersey92 (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete; neologism with no third-party refs. PaintedCarpet (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)