Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Load Impact
- Load Impact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- keep with a quick search on google, I can find several articles in newspapers and mentions about this company.Staglit (talk) 21:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is pretty much irrelevant, because the article is not about the company. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 13:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I could not find substential coverage in reliable sources for this service. In fact there is a couple of mention in the niche press with questional reliability, which I would consider to amass to one source in terms of WP:GNG. There's also a CrunchBase profile page, but this source is building idescriminate collection of IT start ups, and the profile mostly discuss the company, not the service (which is the topic of this article). — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 13:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article lacking significant independent coverage to establish notability - sources used in article are non-RS blogs or developer's sites; a search turned blogs ([1],[2]) but no significant RS coverage; created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 02:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)