Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workload automation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 1. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 12:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, and WP:NEO. It is currently completely unsourced. Bearian (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete GScholar appears to produce nothing but accidental juxtapositions of the two words, and when I add the supposed coiner's last name to the mix I'm reduced to a single paper which appears to be about a different topic entirely. Book hits are even worse. Web hits are more interesting, because they are pretty much all press releases from companies proclaiming how wonderful it is that they are in the most desirable quadrant of Govekar's model. I have found exactly nothing which could be used to define this as a term, much less talk about it at any length; it gives the impression of being, of itself, nothing beyond another square for buzzword bingo. Mangoe (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]