Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decoding the Past
- Decoding the Past (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sources I found:
- http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/arts/television/26stew.html?_r=0 - Not about the series as a whole, but about one episode in particular
- http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/secretskoran.php - Not sure if this is considered reliable source. It's a review of two episodes on DVD
- http://www.usatodayeducate.com/staging/index.php/voices/the-history-channel-steps-into-reality-tv - Show is mentioned only once in a list of History Channel shows
- http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/nr.2012.16.1.61 - Show is briefly mentioned, not significantly covered
- http://www.udel.edu/PR/UDaily/2007/oct/oxford102706.html - PR piece about a professor who appeared on the show
-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Antarctica ₵ 03:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I haven't looked at all of the sources, but I can say that the DVD Verdict review can count as a reliable source to show notability, as can the NYT source. I'll look at the others and get back to you on those. Offhand, the JSTOR source can be somewhat useful since it is in a peer-reviewed journal and it's being cited as a notable example of something... even if what they're talking about isn't particularly positive. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)