User talk:Kittychew

Welcome!

Hello, Kittychew, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nick Studio 10 has been reverted.
Your edit here to Nick Studio 10 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Nick-Studio-10/427779753976472) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nick Studio 10 was changed by Kittychew (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966315 on 2013-03-30T01:14:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:14, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Nick Studio 10. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Whatever you feel about the show, you must be neutral, and the anti-show Facebook page isn't a source. Nate • (chatter) 02:30, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Studio 10, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tinton5 (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Nick Studio 10 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nick Studio 10 was changed by Kittychew (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920776 on 2013-11-18T01:29:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Nick Studio 10

Hi Kitty. I tried myself to search for a source to cite re cancelling, but I could not find one. If you can find one, feel free to put it in the article. If you need help with that, let me know. Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 11:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Once again I could care less about the block; what I care about is a well-sourced and correct article not filled with barbs against young adults simply doing their jobs. Ask.fm is not sourceable in any way and we have no way of knowing if the actor or some friend is answering for him. Once again; stop persisting. Nate • (chatter) 03:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)