Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microstructure informatics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kvng (talk | contribs) at 03:52, 10 December 2013 (other titles?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Microstructure informatics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no information to show that this is an actual field, instead of being occasionally used in a title- DGG ( talk ) 03:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 03:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Here are a couple other sources that establish notability: [1], [2]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvng (talkcontribs) 18:35, 3 December 2013
  • Delete. The title is not often used, and the "application of computer science and information technology in the field of materials science and engineering" is almost always called something else. In fact, the term seems to only be used by the team of SR Kalidindi and AA Salem, so WP:NEO applies. The content of this article is also not worth keeping, being mostly a shopping list of IT topics (not necessarily related to engineering microstructures). The article was created by an SPA, possibly with a WP:COI. -- 101.119.14.28 (talk) 23:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell us what other titles this topic might go by? ~KvnG 03:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]