Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nock (programming language)

Nock (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability Spinning Spark 14:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article itself doesn't need to indicate notability, it's our job to determine if the subject is or isn't notable. After a brief search, I cannot find any sources to support its notability. In short, the article can't indicate the subject's notability in this case. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Walter Görlitz, The article itself doesn't need to indicate notability. Well yes it does. An article stating only that "George Washington was a good man" would be deletable whereas "George Washington was the first presisdent of the United States" would not. Walter, I expect you were implying that I did not follow WP:BEFORE to check if the subject is notable. Well yes I did and no it's not. Spinning Spark 17:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well no it doesn't. I'm sorry you don't understand that basic premise. The article can be about a subject that is notable but not explain it. We could delete it or we could improve it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]