Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex Jihad
Appearance
- Sex Jihad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NEO very few hits on google for this term Darkness Shines (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism. All insurgents/soldiers/rebels likely have sex from time to time; no need to tell that in encyclopedia. jni (talk) 09:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Of the five sources on the article, all of them are only months old. Not only is it a neologism but it seems to be one of very limited use. A buzz word used in literally just a handful of Internet headlines does not an article make. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Several sources report the phenomena and it is a new phrase for what is new to Western readers. Let the article grow as the sources expand. Jason from nyc (talk) 12:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. And the sources are lousy. The only half-way decent one is the IBT and that too is iffy because IBT is primarily a business news site. --regentspark (comment) 13:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEO. The IBT source is also calling the campaign a hoax. Nwlaw63 (talk) 13:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Hoax or not, the concept seems to be notable. Maybe its better covered under some Syrian war propaganda discussion, but a stand alone article seems defensible, as readers are going to try to look this up. Like the Sex drive-in people do look to see this is a real thing.--Milowent • hasspoken 04:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Not WP:NEO. It is the English translation of an Arabic term. Also, it seems to be an important concept of Jihad in the Syrian war, having effects as far as Tunisia. BengaliHindu (talk) 15:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems notable. It should be Renamed to Sexual jihad, though. --Auric talk 18:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Seems notable? 209,000 results As for your rename suggestion, 76,900 results This is certainly a WP:NEO Darkness Shines (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, good deal of secondary source coverage of this notable topic here, enough for significant expansion and improvement potential in the future. — Cirt (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, this was covered in one of the most reputable danish national newspapers today.