Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign language internet

Foreign language internet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:NPOV/WP:BIAS and WP:SYN. Anglophone users may be very prevalent on the internet, but it isn't inherently English. To Russians, we're foreign language internet users. References that use the phrase do so from an English-language point of view; it's meaningless on its own. --BDD (talk) 23:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or alternatively redirect to Languages used on the Internet. There's a merge proposal to that page, but I don't think there's quite anything to merge. In any case, the article is hopelessly biased and not worth saving at all. Ansh6 6 6 01:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Languages used on the Internet. I agree with the nom - the first thought I had on seeing the article was "whose foreign language?" I don't think it would be possible to write a neutral article with this title, or with a paraphrased title, so I think redirection or deletion is the way to go. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, seems to be the most sensible option to also preserve page history for possible future educational usage. — Cirt (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]