Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimedia language code
- Wikimedia language code (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks references independent of the subject. Wikipedia:Independent sources TheChampionMan1234 06:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (shout) @ 09:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (gab) @ 09:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete or alternatively move to WP:Project namespace if deemed useful. Ansh666 19:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, wrong venue. Cited "Wikipedia:Independent sources" is an essay. Applicable policy for AfD is Wikipedia:Deletion_policy and it is not shown that the article meets any of the Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion. If sources are missing use the appropriate tags, e.g. Template:cn or add the sources. TeraCard (talk) 22:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since you're new to AfD, stating that something lacks WP:Independent sources implies that it lacks WP:RS, which would in turn mean the article fails WP:V. That's reason #7 for deletion, "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed". Ansh666 22:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'm also going to add that it fails WP:GNG because of the above. Ansh666 04:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since you're new to AfD, stating that something lacks WP:Independent sources implies that it lacks WP:RS, which would in turn mean the article fails WP:V. That's reason #7 for deletion, "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed". Ansh666 22:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)