Talk:Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
"a" successor
The articles says CABE is "a successor" to RFAC. If CABE is the only successor (as the RFAC article seems to say), then this wording here should be changed to "the successor" rather than "a successor". If, however, some of the responsibilities of RFAC were instead transferred to some other body, that body should (very briefly) be mention here, saying something like "along with the RCXYZ, CABE is a successor body to RFAC". -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 16:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Unknown-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- Unassessed Urban studies and planning articles
- Unknown-importance Urban studies and planning articles