Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morphing Grid

Morphing Grid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a term that has no notability outside of the series of television shows that it is a part of. There are no reliable sources that show that it is notable, only citations that show that the term has been used at various points during the television series and its sequels. If this page is not to be deleted, it should be redirected towards Power Rangers or Mighty Morphin Power Rangers as I had done previously until an IP editor (or one individual using multiple IPs) decided to recreate the article this past month. —Ryulong (琉竜) 01:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Just stating that "hey, this term exists" isn't really enough for it to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. –TC N7 JM 02:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I can't see this lasting as a redirect. It doesn't meet any of the criteria of the purpose of redirects. –TCN7JM 02:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: redirects are cheap and there's no need to strand any readers looking for more information when they could just as easily be redirected. - Dravecky (talk) 19:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Power Rangers or Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. The redirect may have been undone because the concept isn't described in the article. As it's mentioned in several articles, there should be a description somewhere, whether in each place it's mentioned (which would be unnecessary repetition) or as part of a section that it can be redirected to. Peter James (talk) 22:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete really, really, really trivial trivia. Extremely unlikely this has the requisite substantial coverage in reliable sources. Article only sourced to the show itself, which isn't acceptable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. 109.153.185.198 (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]