Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The RŌBLOX Lua Scripting Book
- The RŌBLOX Lua Scripting Book (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book, and content is uncyclopediac as well (as if this page is the book...WP is not a how-to manual). DMacks (talk) 19:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I wanted to speedy delete it but none of the criteria quite fits. The editor was even creating interactive answers to the quizzes with separate articles for each answer. I've never said this before at AfD, but this really doesn't need to remain open for the full 7 days.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:39, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTHOWTO; unreferenced; no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 20:12, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete*, WP:NOTHOWTO/etc. *Let's have a little WP:IAR... —Theopolisme 22:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. If we're to have LUA foisted upon us, the least we could do is IAR and allow some information concerning the use of the language. Not like it's harming anything, is it? --Nouniquenames 05:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- move to the Wikibooks platform. I'm not sure if redirects are permitted to there? Stuartyeates (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- Interwiki redirects do not work, thus it would be a soft redirect which we do not do. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)