Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Logic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for IP editor 99.231.22.54, who posted the below rationale on the article's talk page. On the merits... No recommendation, but do note that the most recent edits to the article were by User:Media Logic Inc., who was blocked shortly thereafter. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:43, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing relevant about why this company should be on Wikipedia. An orphan page too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.22.54 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 8 November 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I really don't see much that even asserts notability here. Sources provided (and everything else I've found) is either routine local coverage in the Albany newspaper or promotional/press-release material that isn't independent. There's a slim chance I've missed something due to conflating hits: the Media Logic Group is a different entity, and it doesn't help that "media logic" has some currency as a term of art in marketing literature. But I'm very much not optimistic. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - There is some coverage in Albany biz journal and coverage / references to coverage in 3 or more industry magazines. The coverage all seems to be in passing rather than with any focus or depth. Unless I see something better, I have to say Delete. Celtechm (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]