Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embedded Parallel Operating System
Appearance
- Embedded Parallel Operating System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously PRODded by RHaworth for being non-notable; endorsed by myself for same reason, as well as the fact that the creator appears to be representing the company that developed this software, as evidenced by their username and this comment on Midhart90's talk page. — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 14:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.
No indication that the software is notable. No secondary sources.(I've included a few secondary sources) The only citations are self-published and are not considered reliable. The subject has been covered by Distributed Embedded Systems, From Specification to Embedded Systems Application, and Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing all published by Springer. Promotional article. and the significance of the coverage is borderline.--xanchester (t) 14:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)- I'm going to try to clean the article up. It may or may not be salvageable.--xanchester (t) 18:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It appears that this article was tagged for deletion 16 hours after its creation. Looking at the EPOS web page, the Publications tab shows dozens of publications by multiple authors over a span of 12 years about EPOS and aspects of EPOS. I agree that there is a potential COI here. I am inclined to keep this article to see how it develops. But I am a new editor and am unclear on deletion policies regarding embryonic articles. Mark viking (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. I'm struggling to tell whether what coverage there is here is independent. I found several conference proceedings, but from the parts that I can see I can't tell whether the papers concerned were written by the team who created EPOS. If anyone can provide links to clearly independent coverage it would be appreciated. --Michig (talk) 19:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)