Jump to content

Talk:Passive electronically scanned array

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RHaworth (talk | contribs) at 18:28, 26 October 2012 (RHaworth moved page Talk:Passive Electronically Scanned Array to Talk:Passive electronically scanned array over a redirect without leaving a redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconElectronics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

How a passive Radar can have an RF source?

The single RF source is not part of the array. It could be replaced by a receiver. The array itself, like a simple antenna, is passive and doesn't care.Cuddlyable3 (talk) 17:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think a better name for this is space fed, phased array. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.97.67.59 (talk) 11:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SFPA ? What does the "space" mean? Cuddlyable3 (talk) 17:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Passive Electronically Scanned ArrayPassive electronically scanned array

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 08:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.