Talk:Computational engineering
![]() | Engineering Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
Added
I just added the page, but it needs a lot of work. A whole lot of good info is out there at http://www.siam.org/students/resources/report.php,
This should be listed as computational science and engineering, and the other two should point to the joint one. Wcleveland 07:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Computational science redirects to Scientific computing. I am not sure what exactly is the distinction between the three except that Computational science and engineering is a current buzzword while Scientific computing is an old buzzword. Perhaps Computational science and engineering focus more on what one can do that is useful to the science while Scientific computing is about how to do it. My suggestion would be to remove the redirect and proceed as suggested by Wcleveland. This article should be merged in Scientific computing and replaced by a redirect. Jmath666 15:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I disagree
I don't agree that the article "Computational engineering" should be merged with the article "Computational Science"/"Scientific Computing".
IMHO "Computational Science"/"Scientific Computing" deals with computing for science. "Computational engineering", on the other hand, deals with computing for engineering. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinisa Kolaric (talk • contribs) 20:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I also disagree. This article should not be merged with the article Computational Science/Scientific Computing. Computational engineering concerns the mathematical modeling of engineering systems. See http://icme.stanford.edu/about/about.php. Timhoooey (talk) 03:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
NPOV dispute
What is the NPOV dispute that is referred to on the article page? Timhoooey (talk) 03:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Who knows? It was placed there a year ago with no explanation and no edit summary. I'm removing it until one is provided. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Reads like a college catalog
This article is almost completely uninformative with regards to what so-called "computational engineering" is and what types of techniques and methods are used. In fact, it reads almost as if it was copied directly from a college course catalog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.168.173.97 (talk) 17:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. Clearly it has some NPOV issues because it reads like an advertisement for some university. As it stands, this article is crap.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.237.252.97 (talk) 04:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree completely. I think it should be a candidate for deletion and forward back to computational science. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.101.162.109 (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)