JAWS (screen reader) is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability
Also, per Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources guidelines and policies, articles cannot be sourced only with WP:primary sources (the vendor) and press releases. Please add WP:Inline citations of additional reliable sources to support the vast majority of statements made in this article. Primary sources can be added, but they are neither necessary nor sufficient, to demonstrate notability, or to verify statements made.
This is a challenge to do research and build a better article, which will be immune from threat of deletion.
Such WP:reliable sources include books, scholarly or professional journals, magazines, and news articles, and should include reviews, analysis, comparison with other similar products, etc. The sources can be online, but cannot be wikis or forums, and should not be blogs. If there are questions, feel free to discuss here, or on my talk page. For help, see WP:Your first article and WP:References for beginners.--Lexein (talk) 11:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've quickly added a secondary source about JAWS' popularity, and therefore removed the notability tag. Of course more secondary sources are needed and would be welcome, but this article is at absolutely no risk of deletion. The bulk of it was written when Wikipedia's standards for sourcing were nowhere near as strict as they are now. Graham8715:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, usually 2 or 3 good beefy sources are needed for N over time, but ok. I was exhausted last night - I've added a book & support for the DOS claim, and started a Features section. --Lexein (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
