Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modularity-driven testing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 01:00, 13 June 2012 (editing closing statement). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:00, 13 June 2012 by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) (editing closing statement)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. However, I would recommend trying to initiate a merge discussion first. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Modularity-driven testing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced since 2007. It's essentially a topic of automated testing and does not require its own page. Merge content into Test automation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural close Nominator suggests a merge. Per WP:BEFORE, this could be done without nominating for deletion. I was going to do this myself, but this is somewhat complicated by the contents of Test automation#Defining boundaries between automation framework and a testing tool and may be best undertaken by someone with more knowledge of the subject area. I suggest undertaking a bold merge, noting that the content is unreferenced. -- Trevj (talk) 10:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.