Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xamin (Operating System)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 80.191.2.222 (talk) at 09:45, 27 May 2012 (→Xamin (Operating System)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 09:45, 27 May 2012 by 80.191.2.222 (talk) (→Xamin (Operating System))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
but this was a real project and a real gnu/linux distribution in iran there were some related refeerences there too i think it was an unfair decission to delete this page.
- Xamin (Operating System) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have no opinion. I am completing this nomination on behalf of an anon user, whose rationale for an earlier deletion attempt was "There is not any independent reference in this article." --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably delete I did a number of Google searches but could not find anything on Xamin. There is already an article about it in Farsi Wikipedia, and I am not sure that it has notability in terms on English language searches. NJ Wine (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why has no one asked/notified the creator? - this is something he could really help with as if that article can be properly sourced it would be notable. I've notified him and the other main article contributer and await their input before making a decision. If I fail to come back, my !vote depends on the sources - if they're there, even if they're in Farsi or whatever (but translated for us by the editors) then keep. Otherwise, userfy. Egg Centric 21:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Notification is suggested, but it is not required [1]. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 14:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources are found. Even less reliable sources such as linux.com, sourceforge.net and distrowatch.com do not have even a single mention of the word "Xamin", indicating this is indeed yet to be noteworthy. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 14:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.