Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beginners Programming Language (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nintendude64 (talk | contribs) at 01:42, 3 May 2012 (Beginners Programming Language: DELETE). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Beginners Programming Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability per WP:GNG; the only mention I can find of it online is very brief, passing mentions in some fairly obscure forums; no coverage online in WP:Reliable sources. Previously AFD'd at WP:Articles for deletion/Beginners Programming Language, but speedy G4 was declined by an admin, since this is apparently a complete re-write with updates about a 2010 version. Scopecreep (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this looks to me like an article where the creator with a minimal guidance could demonstrate notability and significantly improve the coverage of the current article according to WP criteria. BO; talk 14:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What sort of notability did you have in mind? Scopecreep (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/6208/bplxw1.png See this. Entry to PC utilities is something to be called notable... --Programmingfanatics (talk) 18:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why, yes, Version 1.0 for Windows was included on the "coverdisc" DVD included with issue #99 of PC Utilities of April 3, 2008, and this is all what they had to say about it: "Learn to create a great program in around 20 minutes with this beginners-friendly BASIC programming tool". That is not what I call coverage.  --Lambiam 20:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It appears we have a case of a very well formatted article for a topic that is completely non-notable. There are no third-pary references that I could find other than Download.com where anybody can upload their shareware. There doesn't appear to be an active significant community based on a quick visit to the site's forum, even though this isn't necessarily an indicator of notability. I question if this Wikipedia article is intended as advertising since there is both a free and Pro version of this software, and the website also solicits Paypal donations. --NINTENDUDE64 01:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]