Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/April

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting | Proposals | Archive | 2010
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dawynn (talk | contribs) at 13:04, 17 February 2012 (→{{cl|Asteroid stubs}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Proposals, April 2010

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

split of Category:Astronomer stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
2 countries have enough for a split, propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Finnish Winter Olympic medalist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Finland-Winter-Olympic-medalist-stub}} has passed the 60 mark, speedy the above cat? Waacstats (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Polish composer stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I've been on a tagging spree through Category:Polish composers - there should be 70-odd stub tagged now. Ready for a category. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Looks more like 110 articles, support. Waacstats (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Austrian writer stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently upmerged tempaltes {{Austria-writer-stub}} and {{Austria-poet-stub}} have a total of 60 articles, speedy anyone. Waacstats (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

various splits of Category:Scientist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently sorting out the above category and the following are viable from currently upmerged tempaltes.

others that I believe would be viable based on catscan are

Sorry for mixing them all up but 1 proposals easier than 7. Waacstats (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Support the whole blessed lot of 'em. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shooter game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Dawynn (talk) 00:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Support though not sure of the tempaltes, but can't think of anything better. Waacstats (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Flight simulation video game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Template {{flightsim-videogame-stub}}. To be built as an upmerge template to Category:Vehicle simulation game stubs until 60 article limit reached. (Main category: Category:Flight simulation video games) 216.188.204.52 (talk) 11:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

support template, category once it reaches 60. Waacstats (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Paddle-and-ball video game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Main category: Category:Paddle-and-ball video games. This takes in all the Breakout/Arkanoid and Pong clones. Template {{paddle-videogame-stub}}. Will build as upmerge template to Category:Action game stubs until the 60 game limit reached. Dawynn (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:American voice actor stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized. Split by decade: {{US-voice-actor-1900s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1910s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1920s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1930s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1940s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1950s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1960s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1970s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1980s-stub}} {{US-voice-actor-1990s-stub}} And where appropriate, categories. Gosox(55)(55) 22:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

support (though generally stub sorters use 800 for whether a cat is oversized.) you may also want to check the two stub parents for that one as I'm sure I've sorted some articles that should be in there to both the parents. Waacstats (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to go ahead and create these before the normal five day window, even though this isn't technically a speedy. I'm going to be very busy next week and would like to get to this. We're already almost to 3 days and there's 2 supports. I'll probably start creating them this evening. Any objections? Gosox(55)(55) 16:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy support under criterion S2 above as all other US-bar-actor-stub have been split this way. Waacstats (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Atari console game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This is a proposed category name for template {{atari-console-stub}}. This template is easily meeting the 60-article limit. I've looked, and there's a lot more articles that could also be added. Dawynn (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy create. Waacstats (talk) 22:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Maze game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Template {{maze-videogame-stub}}. Main category Category:Maze games. A correlation scan between Category:Maze games and Category:Video game stubs shows 66 articles. Dawynn (talk) 17:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Good spot. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:Kenya geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
2000+ stubs! Split by province asap! Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:41, 20 April 2010 (UTC) Support speedy. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I assume these are the templates categories. Waacstats (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Yep, That looks good. Dr. Blofeld White cat 09:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Support all templates, categories for those that reach 60. Waacstats (talk) 22:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Support ditto Waacstats. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Iran-dam-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have a sudden influx of Iranian dam stubs. Not sure if there are 60 yet but I think a template is needed. Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Might go ahead and create the category, too - I think we're at sixty. (There were 42 when I worked on 'em the other night, and I know we've had quite a few since.) Support both or either, as the case may be. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 13:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Support template, category if there are 60, given who is involved I'm sure we will have 60. Waacstats (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
We do - check out Category:Dams in Iran. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Support per Waacstats. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Beat 'em up stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New template: {{beatemup-stub}}. Main category: Category:Beat 'em ups. Main article: Beat 'em ups. Correlation scan between Category:Beat 'em ups and Category:Video game stubs (and subcategories) shows 81 articles. Dawynn (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

NO problem with the idea but would {{Beatemup-videogame-stub}} be more obvoius choice. Waacstats (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sports video game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create templates.
Couple new templates / categories for this area.

That should about do it for groups that are even approaching a reasonable size. Dawynn (talk) 10:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

As with the prevoius ones, support templates, categories if/when they get to 60.Waacstats (talk) 12:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Austrian people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following are viable from upmerged templates

will require {{Austria-music-bio-stub}} to be created to mop up others. Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Italian people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

with Category:Italian mathematician stubs / {{Italy-mathematician-stub}} also being viable Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:German people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following are viable from upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Swedish people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Russian people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Polish people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

will require {{Poland-music-bio-stub}} to be created to mop up others. with Category:Polish mathematician stubs / {{Poland-mathematician-stub}} also being a viable split. Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Support all -Sorry about my absence from here the last month, I've been busy with GAs! Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Spanish people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Norwegian people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following is viable from upmerged templates

Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

and not one of us noticed it should be Category:Norwegian military personnel stubs Waacstats (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Irish people stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following are viable from upmerged templates

with Category:Irish law biography stubs / {{Ireland-law-bio-stub}} also being a viable split. Waacstats (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
both the following are viable from there currently upmerged templates.

speedy? Waacstats (talk) 18:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC) Support all Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:New Zealand politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized we normally split by political party so the following are I believe the 2 most likely to pass 60

Waacstats (talk) 21:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taekwondo biography stubs/{{Taekwondo-bio-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
As the intersection between the permcat Category:Taekwondo practitioners and the stub cat Category:Martial arts biography stubs. Scan suggests 118 stubs fit into this intersection. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Seems like a good choice. Waacstats (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Couple more Sports video game categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'd like to build a couple more sports categories. This is in recognition of the number of Olymipic games, and similar games out there. Often these games have a number of mini-games, allowing the person to play either just one sport or a wide range of sports. Decathalon, X-Games, California Games would also fall into these categories.

(Not sure why no Summer sports main category. California Games isn't exactly an Olympic game series, but its definitely "Summer sports")

I can't think of any packages that try to lump both seasons into a single game package. I'm sure such things are few and far between. Dawynn (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video board game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Quickly approaching 60 articles. {{board-videogame-stub}}. Main category: Category:Video board games. Dawynn (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

More video game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'd like to create the following stub categories to help break down some of the various video game genre categories:

These will first be upmerge templates, eventually made into subcategories, once article counts allow. Dawynn (talk) 10:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Support templates, categories if/when they get to 60. Waacstats (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Correction. Main article and main category for Action-adventure is hyphenated. Going to use Category:Action-adventure video game stubs Dawynn (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sports video game stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like to break this category down a bit further with the following templates and potential categories:

These will first be upmerge templates for category Category:Sports video game stubs, eventually made into subcategories, once article counts allow. Dawynn (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Further split of Category:Conidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following should help in cutting down the above oversized category

Waacstats (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

split of Category:Fencing biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
the following are all viable

Waacstats (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:ZeniMax Media stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Main article: ZeniMax Media

Proposed new template: {{zenimax-stub}}

This would be a stub category for ZeniMax Media and its subsidiaries. This would help circumvent problems with underpopulated categories for the subsidiaries, also. Notably, templates for {{BethesdaSoftworks-stub}} and {{idSoftware-stub}} could be upmerged to this new template. I think between the three templates (two existing underpopulated, plus the new) there should be enough to justify the new parent category. Dawynn (talk) 02:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Looks like a good idea no problems here. Waacstats (talk) 08:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video game company stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create templates.
I'd like to add two new upmerge templates to this category.

Note that templates already exists for Europe and Asia, as well as individual country templates for USA, UK and Japan. Dawynn (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem with upmerged templates. Waacstats (talk) 08:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Electricity stubs

Currently, the Category:Electronics stubs is a top-level stub category and is oversized. A good part of its contents can be up-merged to the parent Category:Electricity stubs, which does not exist yet, but would be a fine top-level category (or a subcat of Category:Physics stubs). I have already re-stubbed several of the misplaced electronics stubs: please take a look at {{Electric-stub}} and Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Electric-stub. Note that Electronics is just a subset of Electrical engineering, and that marking some articles with "electronics stub" template is rather illogical.

In the end of the day, the scheme should look like:

(Electronics stubs could be further catagorized by {{Consumer-electronics-stub}} but let's do it one step at at time). No such user (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

This seems a reasonable way to go about tidying up this area. Waacstats (talk) 08:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
IMHO, creating a category at this level is already justified. If we declare "Electronics" as a sub-category of "Electricity", then we already have the needed 60 articles by virtue of the subcategory. Dawynn (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Category:Asteroid stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Massivley oversized, mainly due to large numbers of main belt asteroids that need moving but could also be cut down slightly by the following

won't cut it down on it's own but I am sorting large numbers out of it. Waacstats (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Pennsylvania geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, already have by county upmerged templates and the following tempalte has past 70 so propose it has it's own category.

and if anyone knows of any useful regions for the other 60+ counties. Waacstats (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Virginia geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized, uses upmerged templates by county but suggest using 'regions' to breakthisdown a bit

for starters. Waacstats (talk) 00:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Hesperiidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
this one is only' slightly oversized. I propose the following splits

should easily cut it down. Waacstats (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Basidiomycota stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized stub cat I propose teh following subcats

that should keep everything below 800 easily. Waacstats (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Faboideae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
another oversized categroy I propose the following

should get close to 70 articles. Waacstats (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Epidendroideae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another overized cat I propose the following splits

should de oversize this one. Waacstats (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Moth stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 1100 articles, propose the following

should be a good start. Waacstats (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Noctuidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
another slightly oversized (5000+) the following should be viable

Woin't cut it down much but it's a start. Waacstats (talk) 12:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Gastropod stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
slightly oversized I propose the following splits

Don't think this will get it down to below 800 but would be a good start. Waacstats (talk) 12:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

There would be a good start to verify its existence firstly next time. Cyclostrematidae is a synonym. Others are OK. --Snek01 (talk) 20:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

to Waacstats: Also it is quite useless and misleading categorize such articles without knowledge about the theme. Taxonomy of them can, and in some cases often is changing quite often. Then recategorizing became necessary and categorizing of stubs make additional work. Next time categorize only those ones, that you are familiar with (if there are such gastropods). --Snek01 (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Conidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
another oversized category. propose the following genus' be split from the main stub cat

this should de oversize it. Waacstats (talk) 12:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

This over stubbed splitting is against the goal Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting#Project_goals number five: "Ensure that any new stub categories and templates are reasonable, usable, and useful." All other criteria are OK, but there is not usefulness of this. But it is already done... Next time stub sorting of gastropods into families is enough. --Snek01 (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Seine-Maritime geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
category is overisized should be able to split by Arrondissement which would lead to

assuming they have over 60 (should do easily) Waacstats (talk) 09:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/April&oldid=477360255"