Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/April

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dawynn (talk | contribs) at 13:03, 17 February 2012 ({{cl|Hesperiidae stubs}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Proposals, April 2010

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

various splits of Category:Scientist stubs

Politician stubs

Couple more Sports video game categories

More video game stubs

Further split of Category:Conidae stubs

Currently, the Category:Electronics stubs is a top-level stub category and is oversized. A good part of its contents can be up-merged to the parent Category:Electricity stubs, which does not exist yet, but would be a fine top-level category (or a subcat of Category:Physics stubs). I have already re-stubbed several of the misplaced electronics stubs: please take a look at {{Electric-stub}} and Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Electric-stub. Note that Electronics is just a subset of Electrical engineering, and that marking some articles with "electronics stub" template is rather illogical.

In the end of the day, the scheme should look like:

(Electronics stubs could be further catagorized by {{Consumer-electronics-stub}} but let's do it one step at at time). No such user (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

This seems a reasonable way to go about tidying up this area. Waacstats (talk) 08:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
IMHO, creating a category at this level is already justified. If we declare "Electronics" as a sub-category of "Electricity", then we already have the needed 60 articles by virtue of the subcategory. Dawynn (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Massivley oversized, mainly due to large numbers of main belt asteroids that need moving but could also be cut down slightly by the following

won't cut it down on it's own but I am sorting large numbers out of it. Waacstats (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Oversized, already have by county upmerged templates and the following tempalte has past 70 so propose it has it's own category.

and if anyone knows of any useful regions for the other 60+ counties. Waacstats (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

oversized, uses upmerged templates by county but suggest using 'regions' to breakthisdown a bit

for starters. Waacstats (talk) 00:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)