Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mlpy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mlpy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable software, article created by software author. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The library is widely used in the scientific community. See similar projects as scikit-learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidealbanese (talk • contribs) 15:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Being widely used does not indicate WP:Notability Gaijin42 (talk) 15:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think that mlpy is a machine learning software as weka, Shogun toolbox, Orange and scikit-learn... Davidealbanese —Preceding undated comment added 16:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the international repository of machine learning open source software http://mloss.org , the mlpy library is 3th by number of views (25490) and 4th by number of downloads (4892) on 360 software projects. See https://mloss.org/software/views/ and https://mloss.org/software/downloads/ . --Davidealbanese (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:GNG and WP:RS for help in determining what constitutes notability, and sources that would validate notability. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
References added --Davidealbanese (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As a new editor Davidealbanese may want to read WP:COI. It will help the article if he declares his interests (if any). I think more quality sources will be needed to support this article. It is a new sourceforge project with 213 total downloads so far. MakeSense64 (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The project is active since 2008, see http://mloss.org/workshop/nips08/ (NIPS Workshop) and http://web.mit.edu/shivani/www/Ranking-NIPS-09/Proceedings/proceedings-nips09workshop-ranking.pdf#page=22. The project was moved recently to sourceforge.net due to hosting problems. See mlpy in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mlpy. --Davidealbanese (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Verified mentions of the library in reliable sources [1], plus the references cited, support notability. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 18:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 14:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.