Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine

Graphics Layout Engine

Graphics Layout Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - I could not establish notability either. --Kvng (talk) 03:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
• Keep - search reveals a lot of WP:NSOFT-compliant sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

  Would you post them? I couldn't easily find them. – Pnm (talk) 15:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

  The first three I could find with a couple of seconds: [1], [2] and [3]. I have no interest in actually searching references for this article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

  None of those appear to be reliable sources, and I don't think they provide significant coverage either. – Pnm (talk) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

  This is a brief second search in one search engine, which proves the ability of development for this software. Furthermore, it is used in other products, so more detail search can reveal more links. I don't think that "I don't care" is a good reason to make any actions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:N for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. – Pnm (talk) 15:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)