Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scikit-learn

Scikit-learn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable open source software Gaijin42 (talk) 16:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It does get 23 hits in the Google scholar search. Do we consider that trivial mentions? MakeSense64 (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will withdraw the nomination, I searched gnews and did not find references, I will be more vigilant in using scholar as well for articles like this. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is certainly unusual, it is very seldom that gnews and gbooks come up empty for something that is all over gscholar. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, has significant coverage [1]. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 18:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — I wrote this article, but I postponed doing so until after an article has been published about scikit-learn in the high-profile J. Machine Learning Research. If Orange deserves its own article, then so does scikit-learn, IMHO. This toolkit has dozens of developers, 163 forks on GitHub, a small ecosystem of supporting tools such as nltk-trainer, and occasional sponsorship from Google. Qwertyus (talk) 00:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]