Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phantom automation language (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Phantom automation language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software which exists and perhaps was important, but fails WP:N for lack of reliable sources. The article has always been unreferenced. The previous Afd produced some external links – which show it exists – but aren't usable as sources and shouldn't even be kept as links. Pnm (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Article is unreferenced, and there doesn't appear to be any reliable sources available. The article implies that the subject is notable, but there are no reliable third party sources to establish the subject's notability. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 22:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2011 (UTC)