Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Street Band

Fleet Street Band

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Notability of this band is dubious. One source is a blog, another is a German site that tells people at the top to e-mail if they want their album included, and the third appears to be a true source, though the amount of content is not sufficient, in my opinion, to constitute WP:Notability/WP:Band. All self-published titles, no real claim to notability. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The band has released 8 albums through Itunes, and although they are self-released, have been viewed on MySpace many times and have a multi-country fan base. Although the other two sources might be weak, there are reviews of the band that show that they are actively making music. They seem only slightly notable, but I do not believe that self-publishing should constitute deletion. axb500 (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.166.17.194 (talk) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm unable to find significant coverage for this group in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:BAND. Gongshow ^Talk 15:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks coverage in reliable sources, releases not on important label. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is not verifiable