Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unorthodox Scripting Language
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sven Manguard (talk | contribs) at 07:31, 12 August 2011 (Reverted edits by 70.182.78.237 (talk) to last revision by Salvio giuliano (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 07:31, 12 August 2011 by Sven Manguard (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 70.182.78.237 (talk) to last revision by Salvio giuliano (HG))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unorthodox Scripting Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable computer software project: no significant indpendent references found. The sole (primary) reference in the article states "I began learning Ruby at the beginning of 2011 and decided I would attempt to create my own language structurally similar to that particular language". While the achievement is highly commendable, it does not meet inclusion criteria. Two authors (including myself) tagged the article for notability concerns so that the author could address them, but the tag was removed each time without doing so. RichardOSmith (talk) 10:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability - probably because no-one is using it. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 10:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Is a sourceforge project (there are over 300000 of them), but that seems to be where the notability ends. MakeSense64 (talk) 11:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. Google searching suggests they don't exist. Msnicki (talk) 11:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Delete this article if you want. It's a brand new language anyway. I literally wrote it a little less than four months ago. Of course I won't have any references other than myself. Since the article doesn't meet your standards, just delete it. I have already saved the Wiki markup language in case I do find a reference somewhere in the next several years. I appreciate the fact that my article is being taken into consideration. I'm only twenty years old. Do you seriously think I am going to attempt at self-promotion via a web-based encyclopedia? Thanks anyway. At least I learned cool WikiML, right? Later. Iconoclazt (talk) 02:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Iconoclazt[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Msnicki (talk) 12:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Msnicki (talk) 12:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.