Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development of Duke Nukem Forever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RJHall (talk | contribs) at 15:53, 13 June 2011 (Development of Duke Nukem Forever). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Development of Duke Nukem Forever (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not encyclopedic. Yes, DNF had a troubled and long development history. So have many other programs and games. I don't see why this needs a separate article on its own. Presumably the development section in the main DNF article got too long and they spun it off as its own article, but it's really not notable on its own. ScienceApe (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Solid Keep—This is the main article fork from the Duke Nukem Forever article. The delays in this release are approaching legendary status, so yes it is notable in the computer gaming business. It appears to have satisfied the general notability requirements and is not tagged with any warning notices.—RJH (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. RJH (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]