Help talk:IPA/Conventions for English

Hi Aeusoes,

Sorry, your edits got lost in an edit conflict. You'd colored them dark red, a color which is scarcely visible on my screen against the blue background. Anyway, you were thinking of highlighting transcriptions which are different from the ones we use? kwami (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. What we want is for someone who looks up e.g. emission at dictionary.com to easily find out here that dictionary.com is not good at indicating distinctions between ɵ and oʊ, or between ɨ ʊ, and ə. Probably even better than just having highlighted cells, we could have a different section for each of the 8 dictionaries that can be easily linked to in edit summaries or talk page discussion for quick reference. Such a conversation might look like this:

Person A: Why did you change my edit? The pronunciation of emission is /ɪˈmɪʃən/ that's what dictionary.com says.

Person B: See Help:IPA conventions for English#dictionary.com.

Person A: Ahh, I see now.

Person C: Person B, after seeing your logic and rhetorical skills, I would like you to have my baby.

In such sections, we can also point to which other dictionaries make the necessary contrasts. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 10:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good idea.

What are you going to do with the baby? There's a reason I have that quote on my talk page! kwami (talk) 00:13, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added some highlighting. I think for maximum effect, we should minimize it: anything that affects multiple transcriptions that we can summarize (/r/, vowel length) would IMO be best left blue, so that the truly oddball correspondences are noticed. kwami (talk) 00:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this page today, following a link added in Kwami's cleaning activities. It's a good one, but shouldn't we highlight the correspondences to the WP guideline instead of the deviations? I propose to use pale yellow, to avoid obscuring the symbols. And as suggested above we can absorb minor variants like vowel length, superscripts, diacritics. Doing this would show the logic of the WP system choices. −Woodstone (talk) 03:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the pink is scattered all over. I wasn't thinking of it as a way of convincing people of the validity of the WP system, but to highlight the conversions you should keep in mind if you're working out of dictionary X. kwami (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aussie

I'd thought that the Aussie IPA we have in some articles, which is credited to Macquarie Dictionary, used the same orthography as Macquarie. But it looks like Macquarie is only minimally distinct from RP. kwami (talk) 10:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Wells

Several editors use John Wells's blog for place names. Thus we should add a column for his conventions. kwami (talk) 10:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume he uses the same conventions on his blog as he does in the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, so I'd recommend we add a column for that rather than trying to divine a system from his blog. +An gr 11:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. You're right. Do you have it available? kwami (talk) 11:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively, there's this list on his UCL page. Lfh (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kwami, I do have it available but I'm going to bed soon. I'll try to remember to do it tomorrow. Lfh, that list is mostly the same as in the dictionary, except that the dictionary includes symbols for GenAm as well as RP. The only difference I can see is that the dictionary uses ^ən and ^əl instead of n̩ and l̩. +An gr 21:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to bed too, or I would've looked further. kwami (talk) 21:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is /r/ given as a phoneme as opposed to /ɹ/?

I've only heard of this being used in Scottish, and I don't even see an example of that in IPA_chart_for_English_dialects. I would guess that in 90% of cases the use of [r] in transcribing English sounds is flat out wrong from an IPA viewpoint. I'd like to see Wikipedia go by standard IPA and use [ɹ], rather than creating its own transcription for that sound; sure it would be more familiar to most English speakers, but considering that the transcriptions are given as phonemic rather than allophonic, I would think that these transcriptions are mostly used by people for whom the sounds of English might not be native, and would thus add an enormous amount of confusion. These conventions look fine in general; it's just the transcription of the English "r"-sound that sticks out like a sore thumb. I'd appreciate it if someone could let me know where I can talk about this (preferably on my talk page). Is there a talk page for the transcription of English somewhere? Theshibboleth (talk) 01:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]