Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Simulation Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article on non-notable company. —Joseph Roe^Tk•Cb, 10:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable spam ╟─Treasury Tag►co-prince─╢ 12:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This business develops and markets software tools for the numerical simulation of electromagnetic fields, which at least sounds more interesting and important than "project management", and even more of a niche field. Article currently reads like spam: the leading edge tool for the fast and accurate simulation of high frequency devices... a highly specialized product for the fully consistent simulation of free moving charged particles... a versatile tool... a powerful 3D electromagnetic simulation tool... Was hoping that at least some of the Scholar hits would actually be about this business, but almost all of them seem to be occurrences of the phrase "computer simulation technology", and the couple relevant ones seem to be self-generated "about us" sheets prepared for conferences they attended. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.

Keep—As the first company to publically market an FDTD software package, I think they are notable.[1] There appear to be enough independent secondary sources available to satisfy the GNG.—RJH (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question So many results to sort through, I added (CST) and narrowed it down to 15 results about this company. [2] Are any of those results reliable sources? Or just regurgitated press releases? Dream Focus 17:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]