Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar (PHP Framework)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CTF83! (talk | contribs) at 17:08, 19 March 2011 (Closing debate, result was no consensus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 17:08, 19 March 2011 by CTF83! (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was no consensus)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 17:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Solar (PHP Framework) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spam Lorem Ip (talk) 02:42, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - did you seriously call this article spam??? It may not be a super popular framework, but it is used by real world products. The article needs work, but that's never a reason to delete an article or we'd never get anywhere. Ariel. (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - While whether or not the article is spam is arguable, it does lack references and has no clear evidence of notability, which together can be a justifiable reason for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 12:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The article lacks those, but the framework does not. That is a call to improve the article, not delete it. Ariel. (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.