Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CryptGenRandom
- CryptGenRandom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. WP is not a place for articles on individual Windows APIs. There are over 300,000 APIs in Windows (counting all the methods in all the COM interfaces, etc.) An article on the old CryptoAPI set (CAPI) of which this is a part, or on the new Cryptography Next Generation (CNG) set, would be appropriate for Wikipedia, but an article on one API (however interesting) is a level of detail appropriate for a Windows programming Wiki, not here. There does appear to be some fine work done on this article, and this nomination is in no way intended to opine otherwise. Jeh (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 22:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Merge into Microsoft CryptoAPI. The topic might not appear notable, but the content certainly seems. —Ruud 23:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Hmm.... I agree with the desire to not throw away the work done on CryptGenRandom. But since Microsoft CryptoAPI is basically a stubs as far as CryptoAPI is concerned (its coverage of CNG really should be in a separate article, as CNG is not an "update to Crypto API", it's a different API altogether) that would be a very unbalanced article. Taking a different tack... Maybe move this to "Windows pseudorandom number functions" and add coverage of, for example, BCryptGenRandom? Similarly Microsoft CryptoAPI could be probably well be moved to "Windows cryptography APIs]]... but that's another discussion. Jeh (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2011 (UTC)