Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (programming language)
- Einstein (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This language fails to meet the general notability guideline. This is the *only* information I could find about the language: [1]. The link to its homepage from that article redirects to a company that doesn't even sell the product. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 00:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Author could pretty much use his own userspace for this matter. There are lots of non-notable programming languages that appear every month. Some get fluctuating between low amount of users who keep using it from time to time. Definitely fails to meet guidelines to be kept as an article. Userpd (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep because nothing good ever came of a deletion spree. Ubernostrum (talk) 03:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)