Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Field (programmer)

Julian Field (programmer)

Julian Field (programmer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears not to meet criteria for notability under WP:GNG, WP:PROF and WP:NRVE. There is also COI - User talk:JulesFM is the creator and major contributor to the article. Kudpung (talk) 15:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Kudpung (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Kudpung (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Kudpung (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Failed to find significant coverage in sources independent of the subject, under WP:BIO. Ray^Talk 16:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete as clearly above. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC).
• Keep - author of a notable software system. —Tim Pierce (talk) 03:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

That's interesting. Can you give sources? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC).

Here are a few: [1] [2] [3] —Tim Pierce (talk) 16:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I am afraid these are totally inadequate. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC).

You are of course entitled to your opinion. I think that they are sufficient to confirm that Julian is the principal author and maintainer of MailScanner, which is evidently notable. —Tim Pierce (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Which of the notability categories is satisfied? None of the WP:Prof categories are. The MailScanner page looks like an advertisement itself. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC).