Talk:Java Database Connectivity

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Java Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

NOT an acronym

JDBC does not stand for "Java Database Connectivity". This is a backronym. See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jdbc/getstart/intro.html#1018464, first paragraph. The main page should be titled JDBC, with Java Database Connectivity redirecting to it. --Nambio 00:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And from the same site, http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/database/. Sun seems to be contradicting itself for some reason. WP:NAME "[p]refer[s] spelled-out phrases to abbreviations", so even though JDBC is overwhelmingly more popular, the fact that Sun has referred to it as "Java Database Connectivity" mitigates against using the acronym as the page title (see ODBC as a parallel). --DeLarge 23:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I heard it was a trademark issue. In some jurisdictions, you can't trademark an acronym so they had to make JDBC its name, not its acronym. (Northernhenge (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 07:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Example is dated

Class.forName("some string"); is back from 1.0 days and while it still works for backwards compatiblity is not preferred. Jon 13:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Type 5

Deleted section on "type 5". There is no clear definition of what a type 5 architecture is, unlike types 1-4. This is not officially terminology adopted through the JCP. It seems to be to be mostly an invention of Progress Software's marketing department.--SJK (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]