Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazy User Model

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep Sufficient references provided. I'm more than a little concern that this user's first action after registering is to nominate an article for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. I see what looks like coverage in multiple sources in the reflist, and a quick search of Google Scholar reveals six more based on the terms "Lazy User Model" and "Lazy User Theory". While the number of GHits does not assert notability, there seem to be many published, (some peer-reviewed) scholarly papers which refer to the subject of this article to varying degrees. -Addionne (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears to have significant discussion in scholarly sources, for example this. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per above --Addihockey10^e-mail 21:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems to be quite appropriate and notable with necessary references. --NINTENDUDE⁶⁴ 02:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]