Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Models of Teaching

Models of Teaching

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedic, arguably a how-to guide in places. Orphaned. Prod declined. Hairhorn (talk) 18:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This appears to be attempting to be an article about a book, and is categorised as such, but without explicitly saying so, other than a reference to a book of the same name at the end. It was also assembled over 3 days in May through a number of edits by a variety of account names, some which look rather single-purpose. AllyD (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into pedagogy, as this appears to be a POV fork of that article, as well as an article about a non-notable textbook. Bearian (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If we follow the hypothesis that this is intended to be an article on Bruce Joyce's book of the same name, then there may be a case for keeping it: see Google Scholar citations. However this would require a radical salvage, as the current article text looks to be at best a set of notes around the book, at worst chunks pasted from other sources (note the leftover I-voice). And Wikipedia definitely does not need another nth hand guide to "What is Web 2.0?" So Delete unless anyone has the energy/drive to do a salvage rewrite. AllyD (talk) 20:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as revised, and consider merging into an article on Joyce, per citations noted above. Freakshownerd (talk) 00:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]