Jump to content

Talk:Race Driver: Grid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 59.101.22.247 (talk) at 03:24, 2 July 2010 (Information: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconVideo games Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Category Question

The article is listed in the video games with time travel category. Is this correct? Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, it is correct, as there is a flashback feature you can use to rewind several seconds if you make a mistake. It's not a central element to the gameplay, as it is in, say, Timeshift, but it is one of the features that separates it from other racing games. It's a stretch, but it isn't incorrect. Ferrariman60 (talk) 23:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thought they may be talking about the "flashback" feature. I was thinking that the category existed for games which had timetravel as a plot element though which is why I thought it may have been a mistake. Is there a "dictionary" of categories somewhere which explains what they should be used for? Jasynnash2 (talk) 07:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Why does Race Driver: GRID 2 redirect to this page? 87.194.40.167 (talk) 18:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess because it's rumored, but if it's a rumor, it should be removed right? 89.249.0.170 (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is not rumored. The title is indeed in development (also using the Direct X 11 engine), but I guess due to the present amount of information, or lack there-of, no one is able to create a true standalone page for it. You'll note that there is only one edit on Race Driver: Grid 2 and it is the redirect. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ talk 18:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Source? 89.249.0.170 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Review You cant add more publications to the reviews box!!!

I'm just saying but this page is completely biased, as far as i can tell this game is rubbish and some poeple actually have the nerve to say this in reviews, i'm not trying to be biased but you have put so many on but only the ones that say it's a good game, actually first see if you can find a bad review and ALSO document that, cause i've seen plenty of reviews that are bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.114.242 (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as you can tell? I wouldn't make a habit out of judging games you haven't even played if I were you. If you've seen negative reviews of the game, why not edit the article to reflect these reviews? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.233.193.16 (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

firstly i have played the game and secondly i just wanted to say that. Take TES4 it had plenty of reviews expressing it's bad points and givin it modest scores but people seem to only do the good ones. Mind you it was a good game and this is a good game. I just wanted to put across a point. take some movies that are rated on this a bad but plenty of people liked them. Critics don't always reflect pblic views, i don't have anything against this game, it's just a point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.68.85 (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.

David Rush (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information

I added the car lists that I thought were relevant to the article and Downloadable Content sub-article and got deleted. Just wanted to know why? Thanks