Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabble of Devilkin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Balloonman (talk | contribs) at 06:59, 5 June 2010 (→Rabble of Devilkin: k). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 06:59, 5 June 2010 by Balloonman (talk | contribs) (→Rabble of Devilkin: k)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Lord of the Nine Hells. . ---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 06:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rabble of Devilkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article concerns a set of fictional characters from Dungeons & Dragons which do not meet WP:N. Most of the article is unverifiable. I can't find any coverage in reliable sources, GoogleBooks yields nothing, and presumably the books cited are parts of the Dungeons & Dragons series, so they're not independent. Claritas § 18:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While I agree that these individual fictional characters are almost certainly not notable, they can indeed be verified through their appearance in primary sources. Primary sources in fiction can meet V, but not N. Jclemens (talk) 04:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right - what I meant was that I couldn't verify the content of the article through sources found on the internet. Regards. Claritas § 12:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no evidence of notability to provide a rationale for inclusion of this topic at this time. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The content is useful for players who want ideas for their games, but if the publications on this rabble are limited to a few Dragon articles, it is peripheral even for D&D. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Lords of the Nine Hells. BOZ (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Lord of the Nine Hells. No sources to meet WP:N but could fit in another article in the mean time... Shooterwalker (talk) 23:25, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.